Originally Posted by
ImmortalCow
Wut?
Heh, I was waiting for something like that from someone.
Basically since MS & Sony are aiming to kill the second hand market they're making some pretty daft decisions with regards to how games will work on their machines.
Sony going down the route of a game only working on the 1st console it is used in, MS using a similar tactic except they plan to let you buy the right to play the game much like the current "online pass" except not being online specific features; add that the latest thing is their new console will expect to be connected to the net in order to play a game (for online authentication of ownership) and you have a rather grim outlook for the two companies.
So to summarise that:
Sony = You buy the game and it'll be locked to the first console you play it on. Buying codes/licences separate is currently not a planned option.
Microsoft = You need to have your console online at all times to play games and games will be locked to the first console it's played on; however someone else could buy the ability to play that game on their console.
(more than likely close to the original price of the game otherwise it wouldn't stop the second hand market)
How many people are going to buy into a console that they can't manage to trade in older stuff? It's pretty much the norm these days with consoles that you'd buy a game, play it, trade it in or sell it. Even lending it to a friend gets shot down by this stupidity.
It's been stock on PC for that sort of thing for a while, but since shops wont be able to scrape in as much revenue it'll have a further knock on effect - console games wont drop in price as quickly. ATM if you buy something on release you know it'll be cheaper in a couple of weeks, and a few months later it'll be sat at half the price. That process will take a lot longer, possibly mirroring the 90s when a game would usually be sat at full price for a year+ or until a sequel arrived. That of course is arguable since it's speculating based on the past, but it's also a likely scenario. The difference being that on PC a game will steadily drop it's price over time + there are regular sales (at which point a new £40 game will be £10 etc). We still can't trade a game since that's how it works, but when you can pick them up for next to nothing during Steam sales for example it more than makes up for it.
So to finish since I said PC or Wii-U:
Wii-U aint got any of those silly things. You can trade your stuff, lend it to people blah blah.
PC despite having higher costs of ownership for the machine provides lower prices for games as a whole. I'm deliberately ignoring the whole "looks better on a PC" crap because that isn't always the case with a hardware dependant platform.
At least if a PC craps out you can still get your games back, just log into your accounts for where ever you bought them from & you're good to go.
If your game is locked to a console and that machine craps out (which if last gen is anything to go by will happen a lot) then you're fucked.
Note I said console & not account - they aint planning on locking them to your account, if that had been the case it wouldn't be as bad.
Fingers crossed they see sense before release.
Originally Posted by
ImmortalCow
I know right, goddamn, this generation... Fuck off "cutting edge graphics".
Lol'd. No problems with things looking pretty, but you should be picking a machine based on the games and how they play, not what they look like.
I suppose so long as it can provide an accurate simulation of brown & muscles kids will be lining up to buy the fuckers. ;)
Last edited by SkulFuk; Feb 7, 2013 at 09:53 PM.