I've been on these forums since seven years ago and come back three different times, always wishing the replays forum were in a better shape, but finding it worse.
In 2008 you were pretty safe assuming your thread would get comments if it was on the first page. You rarely saw bumping because it wasn't needed. CnC was usually returned without asking, it was just the decent thing to do. Everything was pretty slow, though, there didn't seem to be very many people posting
I can't quite remember how things changed when I first took a break from TB. I wasn't gone for very long, nor was I back for long. But when I came back again in 2010, IIRC, the change was definite. There were more people posting replays, but less people commenting them. It wasn't unusual for a thread to be pushed out of the first page without any comments because people seemed to only post their own threads and camp in wait for their comments. Of course a couple more active people CnC'd each others threads and returned CnC, but the general air was that less people did anything but post their own replays.
Apparently things have been going steadily south since, as the replay board rules have been extended to forbid thread advertising. There would be no need to advertise threads if there was a healthy reciprocity in the community. Now that I'm back since December 2013, people actually comment threads more, but keep the actual CnC to a bare minimum. There seems to be an inexplicable unwritten rule of only critiquing the replays in the latest post by the OP. This makes the board more active in terms of posts, but deprives replaymakers of the critique they need to improve their next replay before they have to post it, especially since bumping without replays is also forbidden.
This event is my first move to try and fix that. I will lead by example by doing what I have been doing silently until now; returning CnC.
Here's how this works:
Most replays I've made since my return have a name with a less than obvious meaning. I will pay the first to know the meaning of each name a minimum of 100tc. Harder to guess names are worth up to 150, and you may earn additional bonuses for certain details in some names. I will also award prizes for explaining the names I explain myself somewhere, just for the detective work.
BUT
for an answer to qualify, you must have critiqued that replay. CnC the replay on
my thread and include your answer in the comment. Then comment on this thread with a quote of your comment and a link to the thread you want critiqued by me in return. I'll critique at least as many replays as you've critiqued.
The replays, as of 1.1.2014
Jolly good fellow: normal prize (2x100tc awarded to pusga)
Whiplash: normal prize
Demolisher Kick: normal prize (2x100tc awarded to pusga)
Bend Ya Cross My Knee: normal prize (2x100tc awarded to pusga)
Reach Out: normal prize and bonus (100tc awarded to zwouter)
Dead Run: normal prize and bonus (100tc awarded to zwouter)
And Touch Faith: higher prize and two bonuses
Mohammad: higher prize and bonus
Spinal Tap: higher prize and two bonuses
Solar Plexus: normal prize and bonus
Doru: higher prize and two bonuses
Spitroast: normal prize
Intimidating Twerk: normal prize and bonus
Sarissa: higher prize and two bonuses (2x120tc awarded to pusga)
Subtle: higher prize
If, theoretically, I were to grab: normal prize
Gone Fishin': higher prize
I will update the above list with new replays and the availability of prizes. If the main answer is given, but the bonuses are not, the bonuses are still free game, to the original poster of the right answer, and others.
You may guess again
twice, on this thread (for a total of three guesses). If you've critiqued the whole thread, you may guess again indefinitely. You will also earn
double the prize if you've critiqued every replay. If you've already critiqued the replay, comment on the thread again and point out or quote your earlier CnC. If you've CnC'd all replays on the thread, but in different comments, quote all the comments here. I'll keep track once I post more replays, but once you've CnC'd all of them for the first time, quote each one.
By critique, I mean
more than three words. Quite a bit more, in fact. Point out something positive in the replay, or why it is utterly devoid of quality, and something to improve on, or why it is flawlessly perfect (as if). Pusqa's
entry is an excellent benchmark for an outstanding CnC comment, but a bare minimum will also qualify you for the prizes. I will ignore your answer as to the name of the replay if I find the
scope of the CnC lacking and point the fact out to you in this thread. I am not forcing you to praise my replays, simply requiring thoughtful criticism. Most of you already know I'll return it.
If your critique doesn't qualify, I will ignore your answer. This is so others won't know if your answer is right before your entry qualifies. If it is the obvious right answer and you've just gone and written it on the thread without being eligible to enter, that is on you. Proper criticism is a rather self-explanatory thing, even without the above paragraph explaining it.
The bonuses are smaller secondary prizes for the same replays, not an automatic addition to the base tc prize for that replay's name. Every main prize is awarded for a simple answer, the bonuses are small details.
I will also ignore extra guesses (more than three) by people who aren't eligible for indefinite guesses (who haven't CnC'd the whole thread. Now is a great time to do that, I'm busy and out of replays).
I'll be lenient about doubling the prizes for whole thread critiqued. I'll round it up to the contestant's favor and won't require brand new replays to be critiqued right away.
Follow the guidelines. It's rather simple. CnC the replay, remember to quote it in your comment here. I will try to do my best to check if you've CnC'd or not even if you yourself fail to quote the comment here, but I may be pretty busy with this thread once it pics up, so everything will go much more smoothly if you do it yourself. It's your entry that suffers if I don't know you're eligible to enter.
The above means that if I'm horrendously busy and can't find your replay thread quickly, and you didn't link it in your entry, I will not critique it in return until you link it. This also allows you to choose another thread for return CnC. If there are fewer replays (that I haven't CnC'd earlier) on the thread you linked/your replay thread if I went through the trouble of finding it myself than you critiqued for the event, I will try to keep track of it and if you want to, I will critique that amount of replays on another thread. I won't check back in real-time to see if there are new replays on every thread, but if I owe you CnC and you need it, feel free to PM.
In short (read at least this):
1.
Critique a replay of mine in my
replay thread, and include where you think its name comes from. If your answer is correct, you earn 100tc (or more, see above).
2.
Quote your comment in this thread and link to the thread you want me to CnC in return
- You may guess again
twice, on this thread, or as many times as you like if you've CnC'd every replay on the thread. You will also earn
double the prize (including possible bonuses) if you've CnC'd every replay. this will not apply retroactively, so if you want double prizes, CnC everything first.
The observant among you may have noticed that tc prizes in this event are tiny. As you might guess from the manifesto above, this event is about the critique. If this one goes well, and I'm not too horribly busy with my studies, I will be host a more lucrative CnC event in the coming months. Think of this as a pilot venture.
Last edited by Archlurps; Jan 4, 2014 at 12:22 AM.