Originally Posted by
KiTFoX
If you think Ron Paul would have been good for this country you need to do some more reading. Sure, he had some good ideas, but the dude was fucking nuts.
I agree with your statement. But I'd rather have an absolute lunatic in charge over a snake in the grass(Romney), the worst human being ever to live(Rick Perry), a person who's entire basis for election is "I'm the most republican"(Santorum, although, I have to say, I like the fact that he is willing to fight for his beliefs, although I may not agree with them.), or, god forbid, Herman Cain/Michelle Bachman. I didn't forget that one other retard, John Huntsman, but, lets face it, hahahahahahahahaha.
I prefer moderates, because, they tend not to be half-wrong all of the time.
It seems to me that Romney adapts his "beliefs" to those of the audience directly in front of him. Perry was a moron, and I'm ashamed to say that we are even of the same Kingdom, Animalia. Santorum doesn't appeal to me at all because of his beliefs, but, I did like the fact that irregardless of the audience in front of him, he was fully behind his beliefs, and I did feel bad for him, after that one interview with his family, and how they lost a kid. I won't even go into the stupidity that is Herman Cain/Michelle Bachman, because I think Herman Cain is a dumber version of Romney, and Bachman is just, the worst woman to ever do anything related to politics, and I'll go far enough to say I'd rather take Palin over her and thats saying something. I don't think anyone can say anything about Huntsman since no one really cared about his campaign. For example, his name isn't actually John, its Jon, but, I didn't care to remove the H to make it correct.