Originally Posted by
Gov_Cheese
You're wrong. The reason why "harmonic" is in the name is because it has more than one note. It has the harmonies of the root note you are playing. so to get a lower harmonic, you don't put as much pressure on the pinch after the initial strike. It's harder to make it squeal than it is to do a lower-tone pinch harmonic because you have to practically stop the string with your pick for it to do that.
active dual humbucker pickups will help too. I prefer EMG.
respectfully, no. A natural harmonic works by "splitting" the vibrations of the string, which is what you seem to be talking about. Say you play a harmonic at the 12th fret on say, the d string, the result will be two separate d's being played on both halves of the string, at a higher pitch,due to the shortened area of string that each "d" is vibrating on.
An artificial harmonic will always be squealy and abrasive if you do it right- in fact, that's the point of the technique. Why? say you fret another d, this time at the 7th fret of the g string, pluck the string, and then create the pinch harmonic over, say the middle pickup - you're just cut that note up into a shitload more pieces than you could manage to anywhere on the fretboard - the result, with a bit of filth on the channel, is going to be one squealy creation regardless of how loudly you play it. If it isn't, then you havent created a "clean" artificial harmonic.
Of course, you can get softer harmonics on the fretboard with more "classical" techniques, which can be softer and lower in pitch. But we're not talking natural harmonics, lol.
As for checking the string with your pick - i assume you're doing these off the pick and not the flesh, yes ?
edit: the real point, other than the tl;dr above, is that pinch harmonics have a time and a place to be used in music. If you want a low harmonic, natural harmonics are probably easier and better suited to the music.
Last edited by H4rl3quin; Jul 29, 2009 at 03:25 AM.