Over the years, highschoolers have become accustomed to a four-block school day. This includes four classes a day and a lunch period. The
required courses are split into semesters. Students take half of their courses the first semester, and the other half in the second. Some schoolboard members are proposing that students take all four classes every day throughout the school year. This change in policy would be a step backwards from the positive state it's currently in.

Four-block scheduling is the current standard for a reason. The dividing of classes into semesters yeilds many benefits. Students are given
more class time daily to complete assignments, and recieve instruction. Students also avoid cramming for various tests, due to the small
amount of classes taken at once. The schedule also allows the students more focus on induvidual subjects.

Some claim that students forget the material taught in previous semesters. This problem is avoided readily with pre-test review of the
course. The number of outstanding graduates, and test scores devalidate this claim. Others claim that the class periods are too lengthy,
and most students lose focus over time during the class. With a 7 period day, students would be less focused generally, due to the more
diverse subject matter. The benefits simply outweigh the risks.

Other arguments exist, but they aren't worth mentioning. Our schedule is fine as it is, and shouldn't be ammended. Attempimg change would be a mistake, and would be a regret of the school board. The majority of teachers and students don't like the idea. Don' fix what isn't broken.

Over the years, highschoolers have become accustomed to a 4-block school day. This includes four classes a day and a lunch period. The
required courses are split into semesters. Students take half of their courses the first semester, and half in the second. Some school
board members are proposing that students take all four classes every day throughout the school year. This is not a good idea for many
reasons.

Originally Posted by War_Hero

Over the years, schoolmasters have become accustomed to a 4-block school day. This includes four classes a day, and a lunch period. The
required courses are split into semesters. Students take half of their concourse the first semester, and half in the second. Some school
board members are proposing that students take all four classes beery day throughout the school year. This is not a good idea for many
reasons.

Four-block scheduling is the current standard for a reason. The dividing of classes into semesters yields many benefits. Students are given
more class time daily to complete assignments, and relieve instruction. Students also avoid cramming for various tests, due to the small
amount of classes taken at once. The schedule also allows the students more focus on individual subjects.

Some claim that students forget the material taught in previous semesters. This problem is avoided readily with pee-test review of the
course. The number of outstanding graduates, and test scores devastate this claim. Others claim that the class periods are too lengthy,
and most Studebaker lose focus over time during the class. With a 7 period day, students would be less focused generally, due to the more
diverse subject matter. The benefits simply outweigh the risks.

Other arguments exist, but they aren't worth mentioning. Our schedule is fine as it is, and shouldn't be commended. Attention change would be a mistake, and would be a regret of the school board. Not entirely sure how to finish this paragraph.

I am against this change in policy because it will/I believe it will reduce a student's focus/understanding of his or her subjects, and reduce student's test scores.