Originally Posted by
Ancient
imo if obamamam wouldbe been more decisive, and attacked quicker, i dont think this wouldve happened. Obama is a scaredy cat, he wont get involved because hes scared the ISIS will attack the U.S if he does. (IMO Dont rape me if im wrong)
This isn't about what the president of the U.S has and hasn't done to defeat ISIS. This is about the United States instead creating the organization, as some sort of hoax. My first thoughts on this is that this is just Propaganda. It's news articles of course; the Media simply wanting to give the public something to read and something to blame the Government on.
"Bush did 9/11" is merely revamped with this. What purpose would come from this? Killing thousands and killing our own simply to gain the trust of a native country and guarantee supplies we can get from another powerhouse country? It's irrational. One doesn't even need to read the articles to know that this is probably just fake and irrelevant in every way possible.
"
ISIS, Iranian leaders have been saying for a long time, is made-in-the-U.S.A., a tool of terror intended by the world’s superpower to divide and conquer the energy-rich Middle East and to counter the growing influence of Iran in the region." (
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/11/wo...tion.html?_r=0
Okay, yet this tool of terror is in-fact counterproductive, because ISIS soldiers are not american (obviously). Were they paid to attack the Middle Eastern Lands, and paid to kill our own?
Or in fact, has the U.S Government simply gone mad and decided it was reasonable to dive into EVEN MORE debt by paying for troops and weaponry, simply to collect "energy rich" material found in the Mid-East?
I would quote more, but what need is there to? the rest is simply nonsense, the Paranoid government of Middle-Eastern countries trying to find someone to blame. Plus, why would be send a Terrorist group after them if we could easily destroy them ourselves?
I'll read into this a bit more. Correct me if I'm wrong.